Rule reference

Environmental Impact Assessment / Environmental Clearance

RULE_EIA_EC

Plain-language overview for organisations checking what may apply to them. This is a reference guide — not a substitute for the official gazette or legal advice.

← All compliance rulesWhat applies to my organisation? →

Environmental Impact Assessment / Environmental Clearance (RULE_EIA_EC)

Reference only — not legal advice. This page is EarthReheal WasteLedger's plain-language interpretation of the rule, written to help organisations understand what may apply to them. It can be incomplete or inaccurate. Always read the official gazette notification or statute, and confirm with your regulator or a qualified adviser, before relying on it for compliance decisions.

Quick Summary

CRITICAL CITATION CORRECTION: The Draft EIA Notification, 2020 was never finalised. It was published for public comment and drew large-scale opposition; it has not replaced the earlier regime. The operative instrument remains the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006 (S.O. 1533(E), dated 14 September 2006), issued under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, as repeatedly amended. Projects listed in the Schedule need prior Environmental Clearance (EC) before construction or land preparation (other than securing land). Category A projects are appraised by MoEFCC on the advice of Expert Appraisal Committees (EACs); Category B projects by the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) on the advice of the State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC), with B further screened into B1 (EIA required) and B2 (EIA generally not required). Category B projects located wholly or partly within 10 km of Protected Areas, critically polluted areas, notified eco-sensitive areas, or inter-State/international boundaries are treated as Category A under the Notification’s General Condition. Starting construction without required EC risks stop-work, demolition, and EP Act prosecution.

What This Rule Is

Full name: Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006.

Issuing authority: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) (formerly Ministry of Environment and Forests).

Notification reference: S.O. 1533(E), dated 14 September 2006, under the Environment (Protection) Rules / Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Multiple amending notifications and Office Memoranda have since modified thresholds, validity, and procedures; the 2006 Notification remains the base instrument.

Draft EIA Notification, 2020 — NOT IN FORCE:

  • Published as a draft (commonly cited as S.O. 1199(E), 23 March 2020 / related draft Gazette materials around March–April 2020 — secondary sources also refer to an 11 April 2020 Gazette association in EarthReheal WasteLedger's seed note).
  • Intended as a replacement/consolidation; faced major public opposition (reports of ~17 lakh representations).
  • Never notified into final force. Product copy, org packs, and vendor checklists must not treat “EIA 2020” as operative law.
  • MoEFCC has continued incremental amendments to the 2006 Notification instead.

Legal basis: Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (section 3 and related rule-making powers).

Legislative lineage:

  • EIA Notification, 1994 — first mandatory EIA regime.
  • EIA Notification, 2006 — current operative framework (decentralised A/B appraisal).
  • Draft EIA Notification, 2020 — draft only; stalled.
  • Ongoing OMs and amendments to 2006 (including procedures for projects near parks/sanctuaries).

Policy purpose: Ensure prior appraisal of potentially significant environmental impacts of listed projects, with public consultation (where required), before irreversible construction begins.

Who This Applies To

Applies to: project proponents of activities listed in the Schedule to the 2006 Notification (industry, mining, infrastructure, building/construction above thresholds, waste-processing facilities, etc.), including expansions and modernisations that cross Schedule triggers.

Appraisal split (paragraphs 2 and 4 — confirmed against commonly hosted 2006 Notification text):

  • Category A → prior EC from the Central Government (MoEFCC), based on EAC recommendations. Category A projects require a full EIA.
  • Category B → prior EC from SEIAA, based on SEAC recommendations.
  • B1 — EIA required after screening.
  • B2 — generally appraised without a full EIA (application + EMP / prescribed documents).

General Condition (Schedule note — confirmed): Any Category B project/activity is treated as Category A if located wholly or partly within 10 km of the boundary of:

  1. Protected Areas notified under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972;
  2. Critically Polluted areas notified by CPCB;
  3. Notified Eco-sensitive areas;
  4. Inter-State boundaries and international boundaries.

EarthReheal WasteLedger seed focus: waste-processing and other projects near sensitive ecosystems or within 10 km of a protected area / national park / wildlife sanctuary — these frequently flip to central appraisal and may also need NBWL wildlife clearance under MoEFCC OMs (e.g., OM dated 8 August 2019 on projects within 10 km of NP/WLS).

Exemptions: Only as expressly provided in the Notification / later amendments for specific item thresholds. Absence from the Schedule, or falling below a Schedule threshold, means this rule’s EC duty may not apply — but other consents (SPCB CTE/CTO, CRZ, forest, etc.) still might.

State-Level Variations

SEIAA/SEAC constitution, meeting cadence, and portal practice vary by State/UT. In the absence of a duly constituted SEIAA/SEAC, Category B projects are treated as Category A (Notification text). Thresholds themselves are nationally set by the Schedule, subject to central amendments.

Compliance Requirements — What You Actually Have to Do

1. Check the Schedule for the project type and capacity threshold; classify A vs B (and apply the General Condition / Specific Condition notes).

2. Do not start construction or land preparation (except securing land) before EC.

3. Apply on PARIVESH (current single-window portal for EC and related clearances).

4. Follow the four stages used in the 2006 regime (as applicable to the category):

  • Screening (mainly Category B → B1 vs B2);
  • Scoping (Terms of Reference);
  • Public consultation (where required);
  • Appraisal by EAC/SEAC → decision by MoEFCC/SEIAA.

5. If within 10 km of a National Park / Wildlife Sanctuary: follow MoEFCC’s OM procedure on simultaneous wildlife clearance / ESZ interaction (8 August 2019 OM and any superseding instructions).

6. Comply with EC conditions and file periodical compliance reports; seek amendment/expansion EC when capacity or process changes trigger the Notification.

7. Stack parallel regimes: CRZ, forest diversion, Hazardous Waste, etc., as applicable — EC is not a wrap-around permit for every environmental duty.

Penalties & Enforcement

Starting construction without the required EC can result in stop-work orders, demolition, and prosecution under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (seed penalty). MoEFCC/SEIAA may revoke EC for non-compliance; SPCBs may refuse or cancel CTE/CTO where EC is missing; NGT frequently adjudicates illegal construction and post-facto regularisation disputes. Treat “we will get EC later” as high-risk non-compliance, not a process option.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which law applies in 2026 — EIA 2006 or EIA 2020? A: EIA Notification, 2006, as amended. EIA 2020 remains a draft only.

Q: Our Category B project is 8 km from a sanctuary — who appraises it? A: Under the General Condition it is treated as Category A (MoEFCC/EAC), unless a later amendment specifically alters that trigger for your Schedule item — verify the current Schedule note text.

Q: Does B2 mean “no environmental permission needed”? A: No. B2 still needs prior EC from SEIAA; it generally skips a full EIA study, not the clearance itself.

Q: Can we fence the plot and cut trees before EC? A: The Notification restricts construction work and land preparation (except securing land) before EC. Tree cutting / site levelling that amounts to preparation is commonly treated as premature — obtain written clarification for borderline site-securing activities.

Q: Is post-facto EC allowed? A: Post-facto regularisation has been the subject of repeated litigation and shifting MoEFCC practice. Do not design compliance processes around post-facto EC; the Notification’s baseline duty is prior clearance.

Government / Official Sources

Note: Dozens of amendments and OMs modify the 2006 baseline. For any live project, read the current Schedule entry + latest OM on PARIVESH rather than an unamended 2006 PDF alone.

Related Rules

  • RULE_ESZ — notified eco-sensitive areas interact with the General Condition and activity lists.
  • RULE_CRZ_2019 — composite EC + CRZ clearances.
  • RULE_FOREST_ACT — forest diversion often parallel.
  • RULE_NGT_ORDERS — EC violation and post-facto disputes.

Additional Reference Content

Secondary sources (law firm explainers, news, consultancy blogs, or official-body sites on a non-.gov.in/.nic.in domain) — useful context, not primary legal authority.

Looking for which rules apply to your organisation type? See the interactive coverage picker on the compliance coverage page.